A man convicted of possessing child pornography argued that his unsecured wireless access point means that the evidence against him should have been thrown out. An appeals court disagrees, demonstrating why arguing that "my WiFi network was open" isn't a great legal strategy.
read more | digg story
Monday, April 23, 2007
Child porn case shows that an open WiFi network is no defense
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment